# |
Simulation |
Watershed Hydrology |
FC Loading |
Grid |
Sensitivity |
Purpose |
Comment |
S1 |
April 19-20, 2004 |
1.00 |
25th
Percentile |
94x105
91x96 |
|
Verification |
Model Verification
for Dyes Inlet Stations (low loading) |
S2 |
April 19-20, 2004 |
1.00 |
Geomean |
94x105
91x96 |
|
Verification |
Model Verification
for Dyes Inlet Stations (average loading) |
S3 |
April 19-20, 2004 |
1.00 |
75th
Percentile |
94x105
91x96 |
|
Verification |
Model Verification
for Dyes Inlet Stations (high loading) |
S4 |
May 26-27, 2004 |
1.00 |
25th
Percentile |
94x105
91x96 |
Low Estimate
for FC Loading |
Verification |
Model Verification
for Bremerton Stations (low loading) |
S5 |
May 26-27, 2004 |
1.00 |
Geomean |
94x105
91x96 |
Base
Model (average loading) |
Verification |
Model Verification
for Bremerton Stations (average loading) |
S6 |
May 26-27, 2004 |
1.00 |
75th
Percentile |
94x105
91x96 |
High Estimate
for FC Loading |
Verification |
Model Verification
for Bremerton Stations (high loading) |
S7 |
Oct 18-19, 2004 |
1.00 |
25th
Percentile |
94x105
91x96 |
|
Verification |
Model Verification
for Port Orchard Stations (low loading) |
S8 |
Oct 18-19, 2004 |
1.00 |
Geomean |
94x105
91x96 |
|
Verification |
Model Verification
for Port Orchard Stations (average loading) |
S9 |
Oct 18-19, 2004 |
1.00 |
75th
Percentile |
94x105
91x96 |
|
Verification |
Model Verification
for Port Orchard Stations (high loading) |
S10A |
WY2003 |
1.00 |
Geomean |
91x96 |
|
Verification |
Comparison
to field data for WY2003 Oct 1, 2002 - Sep 30, 2003 |
S10B |
WY2003 |
1.00 |
Geomean |
94x105 |
|
Verification |
Comparison
to field data for WY2003 Oct 1, 2002 - Sep 30, 2003 |
S11 |
WY2003 |
1.00 |
Geomean |
91x96 |
|
Actual
Conditions |
Simulate
actual conditions and assess compliance with marine
water quality standards |
S12 |
WY2003:100/200 |
1.00 |
100/200 |
91x96 |
|
Standard
Part 1 |
Part 1:
Streams and Stormwater set to 100 cfu/100ml; WWTP set
to 200 cfu/100ml; Assess compliance in marine waters
if freshwater sources meet 100/200 (Part I of the bacteria
standard) |
S13 |
WY2003:200/400 |
1.00 |
200/400 |
91x96 |
|
Standard
Part 2 |
Part 2:
Streams and Stormwater set to 200 cfu/100ml; WWTP set
to 400 cfu/100ml; Assess compliance in marine inlets
if freshwater sources meet 200/400 (Part II of the bacteria
standard) |
S14 |
May 26-27, 2004 |
1.20 |
Geomean |
94x105 |
Increase
Flow by 20% |
Sensitivity |
May 2004
storm with modeled flows increased by 20% |
S15 |
May 26-27, 2004 |
2.00 |
Geomean |
94x105 |
Increase
Flow by 100% |
Sensitivity |
May 2004
storm with modeled flows increased by 100% |
S16 |
May 26-27, 2004 |
1.00 |
Geomean |
94x105 |
Wind |
Sensitivity |
May 2004
storm with constant wind of 10 m/sec (22.6 mph) from
SW |
S17 |
May 26-27, 2004 |
1.00 |
Geomean |
94x105 |
No FC dieoff |
Sensitivity |
May 2004
storm with no FC Die Off (simulates conservative substance) |
S18 |
Future Build Out –
Expansive (Same) |
N. Dyes Future Flow |
N. Dyes Future Expansive
Build Out with Same Buffer |
94x105 |
Future Flow
and Geomean FC with Same Buffer for N. Dyes |
Future
Conditions |
N. Dyes
watersheds (Barker, Clear, Strawberry, Chico, LMK001,
LMK002, BST01, and SBC) set to future flow and geomean
FC loading with same buffer
for expansive build out development scenario |
S19 |
Future Build Out –
Expansive (Reduced) |
N. Dyes Future Flow |
N. Dyes Future Expansive
Build Out with Reduced Buffer |
94x105 |
Future Flow
and Geomean FC with Reduced Buffer for N. Dyes |
Future
Conditions |
N. Dyes
watersheds (Barker, Clear, Strawberry, Chico, LMK001,
LMK002, BST01, and SBC) set to future flow and geomean
FC loading with reduced buffer
for expansive build out development scenario |
S20 |
Future Build Out –
Expansive (Full) |
N. Dyes Future Flow |
N. Dyes Future Expansive
Build Out with Full Buffer |
94x105 |
Future Flow
and Geomean FC with Full Buffer for N. Dyes |
Future
Conditions |
N. Dyes
watersheds (Barker, Clear, Strawberry, Chico, LMK001,
LMK002, BST01, and SBC) set to future flow and geomean
FC loading with full buffer
for expansive build out development scenario |